For the examination we used the online media monitoring and analyzer system Neticle to find out what the internet says about this topic, what were the biggest scandals on the web and ultimately how to handle this question, what to think about it. To this end, Neticle analyzed all the public articles, blog posts, social media contents (Facebook, YouTube, forums, Twitter, Google+) and comments below them between 01.01.2018 and 30.06.2018. to get a big picture of the topic.
In the examined period there was 389 mentions on the Bulgarian web, mainly in articles and frontpages (altogether 68,9% of all mentions). Neutral and negative context were dominant. The topic also appeared on Facebook and in the comments but only in connection with the articles, users don’t talk about it separately.
Figure 1 - The proportion of mentions according to fake news divided by forms of content. Source of data: Neticle
Figure 2 – The most active sites in the topic of fake news, source of data: Neticle
Besides users also use the expression in negative context, as a profane word. Often comes up in political context, indicated also by the conversations made in Facebook groups with similar topic.
Based on the comments, a new ’trend’ arises, namely that users are becoming uncertain about the realty or fakeness of news and therefore questioning every arguable news. Having an argument around the topic is getting more and more usual on social media. When it comes to disagreements, chances for consensus are very low. Furthermore, after a suspicious news appears on a site, users question their reliability. Therefore, portals have to be more conscious about the news they share to the public.
Along with political topics, fake news did not avoid public matters and celebrities as well: the fake news about the death of Sylvester Stallone caused for example a huge buzz even on the Bulgarian web (almost as big as the scandal around Trump). Moreover there were some cases when seaside cities between New York and New Orleans got some fake alert of tsunami danger. The latter one may not be part of the definition of fake news but shows the relevance of the topic.
More people use the term ‘disinformation’ instead of fake news as some kind of aggravation, indicating that the stated informations were intentionally false – not just because some misunderstanding or bad translation.
Most of the fake news are spreading on Facebook, which is becoming an issue since the Cambridge Analytics scandal. Therefore Facebook issued several statements to assure users of getting rid of fake news.
Apparently conspiration theories also did not avoid the topic thus there were some mentions about the possibility of a fourth (yes, fourth because they thought there will obviously be a third in the upcoming years) world war.
Figure 3 – Change in the number of mentions regarding fake news, source of data: Neticle (the peak was caused by articles about Trifonov calling Borisov a liar
We will help you with the analysis of media data.